On sön, 2010-10-31 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > But I'm still wondering whether it's smart to try to promote all of > this fundamentally-auxiliary information to first-class status. It's > really unclear to me that that will end up being a net win either > conceptually or notationally.
Fair enough, but this patch arose from the discussion that the collation patch had a lot of hunks that just changed (typeid, typmod) to (typeid, typmod, collation) and that that could be isolated by collecting those into a common data structure. We can abandon this line of thought and I'll go back to my original project, but I thought others who are thinking about improving typmods could also benefit from this work. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
