On 10/23/2010 08:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Another thought here is that the split-in-half rule might be
unnecessarily dumb.  It leaves equal amounts of code space on both sides
of the new value, even though the odds of subsequent insertions on both
sides are probably unequal.  But I'm not sure if we can predict the
usage pattern well enough to know which side is more likely.


We can't. In particular, we can't rely on the label to tell us, so we have no information at all to go on, really. Let's just go with the simple midpoint.

Are you going to try doing this?

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to