On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: >> Sure. The reason to do it, though, is so that extension authors can create >> just one metadata file, instead of two (or three, if one must also put such >> data into the Makefile). > > That's a good idea, but my guess is that the implementation cost of > supporting the control format in your perl infrastructure is at least an > order of magnitude lower than the cost for me to support your current > JSON file format, so I lean towards you having an automated way to fill > in the json file from the control one...
Ah, truth to power. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
