Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Um, other than "show work_mem" or "select from pg_settings"? > > The fact is that you cannot know the active value anyway without > checking, because what you did with SET PERMANENT might be overridden > in various session-local ways. The proposal for hand-edited versus > machine-edited files just adds one more layer of possible overrides > to the existing half-dozen layers, all of which are widely considered > features not bugs. So I see no merit in your argument.
I understand that. I just think there are already too many sources for GUCs and would welcome that there's a single possible source file with a complete remote editing feature. -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
