On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Now, the more relevant question, what I actually need in order for a Sync > Rep feature in 9.1 to be useful to the people who want it most I talk to. > That would be a simple to configure setup where I list a subset of > "important" nodes, and the appropriate acknowledgement level I want to hear > from one of them. And when one of those nodes gives that acknowledgement, > commit on the master happens too. That's it. For use cases like the > commonly discussed "two local/two remote" situation, the two remote ones > would be listed as the important ones.
That sounds fine to me. How do the details work? Each slave publishes a name to the master via a recovery.conf parameter, and the master has a GUC listing the names of the important slaves? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
