The problem with this is that the existing functionality of LOs allows 
you to share a single LO across multiple tables.  There may not be a 
single source, but multiple.  Since LOs just use an OID as a FK to the 
LO, you can store that OID in multiple different tables.

--Barry

Mario Weilguni wrote:
> would'nt it be much better to expand pg_largeobject to have another column "src_oid" 
>(or similar), containing the OID of the referencing table from pg_class, and when 
>accessing large objects take the privilieges from the referencing class?
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Damon Cokenias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. April 2002 11:04
> An: pgsql-hackers
> Betreff: [HACKERS] Large object security
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I see there's a TODO item for large object security, it's a feature I'd really like 
>to see.  I'm willing to put in the time to write a patch, but know far to little 
>about postgres internals and history to just dive in.  Has there been any discussion 
>on this list about what this feature should be or how it might be implemented?  I saw 
>a passing reference to "LOB LOCATORs" in the list archives, but that was all.
> 
> What's a LOB LOCATOR ? 
> 
> What about giving each large object its own permission flags? ex:
> 
> GRANT SELECT ON LARGE OBJECT 10291 TO USER webapp;
> GRANT SELECT, DELETE, UPDATE ON LARGE OBJECT 10291 TO USER admin;
> 
> Default permission flags (and INSERT permissions) would be set at the table level.  
>All objects without specific permissions would use the table rules.  This allows for 
>backward compatibility and convenience.
> 
> I think per-object security is important.  A user shouldn't be able to get at 
>another user's data just by guessing the right OID.  Ideally, users without 
>permission would not know there were objects in the database they were not allowed to 
>see.
> 
> I can also imagine a security scheme that uses rule/trigger syntax to give the user 
>a hook to provide her own security functions.  I haven't thought that through, though.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> 
> -Damon
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to