On 10/02/2010 10:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> writes:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
message
Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".
+1, that sounds like a good idea.
Yeah, I agree.
Where are the procedures actually documented?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
