Attached are two versions of the same patch, with and without --patience. The with-patience version has only two hunks, removal of a big block of comment and addition of a big block of code.
The without-patience patience is riddled with the mix of two hunks, spread until line 120. --patience is a clear winner here. Regards, On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov > wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > Do you have an existing commit where you see a difference so I can > > try it and see if there is some other problem that my local > > configuration has? > > Random poking around in the postgresql.git commits didn't turn up > any where it mattered, so here's before and after files for the > example diff files already posted. If you create branch, commit the > before copy, and copy in the after copy, you should be able to > replicate the results I posted. > > -Kevin > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > -- gurjeet.singh @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company http://www.EnterpriseDB.com singh.gurj...@{ gmail | yahoo }.com Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
diff_without_patience.patch
Description: Binary data
diff_with_patience.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
