Aidan Van Dyk <ai...@highrise.ca> wrote: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I'm sure there's several things you can accomplish with >> synchronous replication, perhaps you could describe what the >> important use case for you is? > I'm looking for "data durability", not "server query-ability" Same here. If we used synchronous replication, the important thing for us would be to hold up the master for the minimum time required to ensure remote persistence -- not actual application to the remote database. We could tolerate some WAL replay time on recovery better than poor commit performance on the master. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
