Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think this is *all* *should be* or *all
> or nothing* kind of thing. If a SET variable has
> its reason, it would behave in its own right.
Well, we could provide some kind of escape hatch to let the behavior
vary from one variable to the next. But can you give any specific
examples? Which SET variables should not roll back on error?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
