Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Oh, I thought part of the objective here was to try to centralize that > stuff. If we're assuming that slaves will still have local replication > configuration files, then I think we should just add any necessary info > to those files and drop this entire conversation. We're expending a > tremendous amount of energy on something that won't make any real > difference to the overall complexity of configuring a replication setup. > AFAICS the only way you make a significant advance in usability is if > you can centralize all the configuration information in some fashion.
+1, but for real usability you have to make it so that this central setup can be edited from any member of the replication. HINT: plproxy. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
