Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 22/09/10 20:00, Robert Haas wrote: > > But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that > > rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people > > probably want to eventually have. > > FWIW it could be a system catalog backed by a flat file. But I'm not in > favor of that for the other reasons I stated earlier.
I thought we just eliminated flat file backing store for tables to improve replication behavior --- I don't see returning to that as a win. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
