On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:21, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> On tis, 2010-09-21 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> rather than global ignore patterns for *.a and *.so.[0-9] >>> >>> Probably rather *.so.[0-9.]+ > >> Any particular reason not to just do .so.*? > > Just paranoia, I guess. I can't actually see a reason why we'd have > any committable files in the tree matching that pattern. OTOH, we > probably also need the same type of pattern for .sl and .dylib, > so at some point a more conservative pattern would be wise.
Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
