On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 06:05:59PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:34:45 -0700
>
> I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I just think I'd like to
> concentrate on the locally-cached plans for now and see if
> there is a need to add shared plans later.
Yes, later we can use shared memory buffer as "pipe" between
backends:
Backend A: Backend B:
local-memory-query-plan --> shmem --> local-memory-query-plan
In this idea is in the shared memory one query-plan only and backends
use it for plan copying from "A" to "B".
It require persistent backends of course.
Karel
PS. it's idea only and nothing other, the original qcache was idea
only too :-)
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
