On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian<br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> >>> FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine >> >>> with the attached minor changes. >> >> I thought you were replacing that old thing with pile of hardware that >> >> Matthew was putting together? >> > Matthew was busy this summer so I am going to try to get some of his >> > time by January to switch to Ubuntu. And some people are complaining we >> > will lose a BSD test machine once I switch. >> > >> >> Test machines belong in the buildfarm. And why would they complain about >> losing a machine running a totally out of date and unsupported OS? Maybe >> you should run BeOS instead. > > Well, I can run tests for folks before they apply a patch and "red" the > build farm. I can also research fixes easier because I am using the OS, > rather than running blind tests. I am just telling you what people told > me.
I've been slowly trying to rebuild something that was in use at the OSDL to test patches. I just proofed something that I think works with the git repository: http://207.173.203.223:5000/patch/show/48 If you click on the PASS or FAIL text, it will display the SHA1, author and commit message that the patch was applied to. Think this will be useful? Mark -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
