On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:37, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:32, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I wrote: >>> Something in the rsync process thinks that ignoring subdirectories >>> named "core" is a good idea. I'm a bit surprised nobody ever noticed >>> these were missing from anoncvs before ... >> >> That's because they aren't. It's the -C switch in your rsync call >> that's at fault. (And this demonstrates why comparing against checkouts >> from the same CVS repo isn't an end-to-end test :-() > > Yeah, I noticed that too. Re-running now.
Ok, re-run off a correct rsync pushed. How does it look now? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
