"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So should I go ahead and submit a patch for BETWEEN that adds SYMMETRY > support in the old-style code, and then at a later stage submit a patch that > makes BETWEEN a proper node?
I'd prefer to do it in one step. I have not noticed any large groundswell of demand for BETWEEN SYMMETRIC ... so I don't see a good reason for implementing a stopgap version. (It would be a stopgap mainly because the planner wouldn't recognize it as a range query.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html