Excerpts from Markus Wanner's message of mar sep 14 12:56:59 -0400 2010: > What bugs me a bit is that I didn't really get much feedback regarding > the *bgworker* portion of code. Especially as that's the part I'm most > interested in feedback.
I think we've had enough problems with the current design of forking a new autovac process every once in a while, that I'd like to have them as permanent processes instead, waiting for orders from the autovac launcher. From that POV, bgworkers would make sense. I cannot promise a timely review however :-( -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
