Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > I'm not really happy with the naming, comments, or some of the code > flow, but I think the concept looks reasonable.
There seems to be a lot of unnecessary palloc/pfree traffic in this implementation. Getting rid of that might help the speed. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers