Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 7 August 2010 03:51, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I was testing out this feature this morning and discovered that the
> results may be non-deterministic if the PK is deferrable.

Good point.

> The original version of the patch had that check in it, but it
> vanished from the final committed version. Was that just an oversight,
> or an intentional change?

I don't recall having thought about it one way or the other.  What did
the check look like?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to