On Aug 21, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > hmm FWIW I would interpret something like 9.0.1B4 as the forth beta > release for the first point release of the major release 9.0 bis seems > stupid and is not anything we have done before.
It does't make sense for PostgreSQL, no. > You could argue that 9.0.0B4 is the foourth beta for the first > production release of 9.0 but I find the current naming much more > reasonable... Yeah, it's just semantics, really. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
