Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes:
> There's already been one rather-long thread on this topic.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.general/121450
> In there I argue for the empty array interpretation and Tom goes back
> and forth a few times. I'm not sure where that thread ended though.
I had forgotten that discussion. It looks like we trailed off without
any real consensus: there was about equal sentiment for an array with
zero elements and an array with one empty-string element. We ended
up leaving it alone because (a) that wouldn't break anything and (b)
you could use COALESCE() to substitute whichever behavior your
application needed for the case.
So maybe we need to revisit the issue. Pavel was claiming that
switching to a zero-element array result was a no-brainer, but evidently
it isn't so. Is anybody still excited about the alternatives?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
