On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:48:58PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with > > complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one > > advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can > > use a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, > > I can use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort > > or readability for example a Perl's hash tables. > > Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)
When's that going into the tree? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
