Hi, Kevin Grittner írta: > Marc Cousin <cousinm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> This time, it's this case that doesn't work : >> > > >> I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here. >> > > Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4c516c3a.6090...@cybertec.at > > I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request > that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF. Does anyone > feel this approach (without the framework) should be pursued > further? >
I certainly think so, the current scheme seems to be very fragile and doesn't want to be extended. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
