Le 21/07/2010 09:53, Dave Page a écrit : > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> My preference would be to stick to a style where we identify the >>> committer using the author tag and note the patch author, reviewers, >>> whether the committer made changes, etc. in the commit message. A >>> single author field doesn't feel like enough for our workflow, and >>> having a mix of authors and committers in the author field seems like >>> a mess. >> >> Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the >> author field. > > I hadn't realised that was possible until Guillaume did so on his > first commit to the new pgAdmin GIT repo. It seems to work nicely: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=08e2826d90129bd4e4b3b7462bab682dd6a703e4 >
It's one of the nice things with git. So, I'm eager to use it with the pgAdmin repo. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
