Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. My mistake. In looking at the regression failures in your post, I > thought I saw errors being reported of this type. My bad.
Well, although that particular case isn't a problem, I am sure that this change will break some existing applications --- the question is how many, and do we feel that they're all poorly coded? I suspect that the main thing that will cause issues is removal of implicit coercions to text. For example, in 7.2 and before you can do test72=# select 'At the tone, the time will be ' || now(); ?column? ------------------------------------------------------------- At the tone, the time will be 2002-04-11 11:49:27.309181-04 (1 row) since there is an implicit timestamp->text coercion; or in a less plausible example, test72=# select 123 || (33.0/7.0); ?column? --------------------- 1234.71428571428571 (1 row) With my proposed changes, both of these examples will require explicit casts. The latter case might not bother people but I'm sure that someone out there is using code much like the former case. Since I didn't see an immediate batch of squawks, I think I will go ahead and commit what I have; we can always revisit the implicit-allowed flag settings later. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly