On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > The patch have no features for performance improvement of synchronous > replication. I admit that currently the performance overhead in the > master is terrible. We need to address the following TODO items in the > subsequent CF. > > * Change the poll loop in the walsender > * Change the poll loop in the backend > * Change the poll loop in the startup process > * Change the poll loop in the walreceiver > * Perform the WAL write and replication concurrently > * Send WAL from not only disk but also WAL buffers
I have a feeling that if we don't have a design for these last two before we start committing things, we're possibly going to regret it later. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
