* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > I think we have to assume that whatever actions a pluggable security > provider might take at authentication time are going to be based on > information from outside the database.
I feel that would be perfect for 9.1 and supporting access to the
general catalog is something that, if we figure out a sane way to
do it, we could always add later (if there's demand, etc).
For those bits of the catalog which *do* meet the requirements you
mention, I hope it'll be possible for the security module to access
them? Does make me wonder if we might consider adding a field to those
to support a label rather than trying to figure out a way for a third
party to provide a shared/nailed relation.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
