On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One point that isn't completely clear from Magnus' description is > whether we should remove the $PostgreSQL$ lines from the HEAD branch > only, or from the still-active back branches as well. I vote for the > latter --- that is, if you pull a historical version of some file > from the archives, you should see the appropriate $PostgreSQL$ line, > but we won't have them in the source files for any future minor > release. The reason for this is that otherwise there will be files > floating around that claim to be CVS version x.y.z, but actually are > different from that, because of back-patching activity after the git > transition. That seems like a recipe for huge confusion in itself.
Agreed. They should be removed from the active back branches. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
