On Sun, July 4, 2010 9:58 am, Tom Lane wrote: > > BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO > originally. What's changed to alter that decision? >
Nothing that I know of, I think there is just a little impatience here. I think the consensus was that we needed to get some experience of DO in the field before looking at a parameter mechanism. I still think that's the correct position. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
