Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-02/msg00174.php
> I wonder if we should think about back-patching just the syscache.h
> portion of that patch. It would simplify back-patching, and might
> make life easier for people trying to write extensions that are
> compatible with multiple PG versions, too.
Not sure. Maybe it will make back-patching a bit easier, but we don't
normally consider back-patching cosmetic changes, which is what this
really is.
I don't buy the suggestion that third-party extensions would be able
to rely on it across versions. They can't know if they're going to be
compiled against the latest minor release or not. So it's just a
question of whether it'll improve matters enough for our own
back-patches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
