On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm confused.  This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>>> was not controversial.  The problematic operator is => no?
>
>> It used to be =>
>
> Nevermind, I *am* confused.  Obviously time to knock off for the day;
> my brain's fried.

Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to