Hello, Tom. You wrote:
TL> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> What's your idea of "affecting the fewest people"? There is no previous >>> history to be backward-compatible with, because we never supported >>> keepalive on Windows before. >> Well, starting in 9.0, keepalives in libpq will default to 'on': TL> Yes, which is already a change in behavior. I don't understand why you TL> are worrying about "backwards compatibility" to parameter values that TL> weren't in use before. I think self-consistency of the new version is TL> far more important than that. Absolutely agree. >> even if we use Windows defaults, those defaults might be different for >> different Windows versions. TL> I'm not sure if that's an issue or not, but if it is, that seems to me TL> to argue for #2 not #1. TL> regards, tom lane -- With best wishes, Pavel mailto:pa...@gf.microolap.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
