On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > I don't much like hstore(hstore, text[]) because it's not strictly a > constructor. But I could certainly live with something based on the > word slice. The existing SQL function backing the operator is called > slice_hstore(), whereas I would probably prefer hstore_slice() or just > slice(), but I can't talk about it right now because I have to go > finish laundering the paint out of my entire wardrobe. Having already > written three patches to rename this operator (to three different > names), I'm in no hurry to write a fourth unless the degree of > consensus is sufficient to convince me I shan't need to write a fifth > one.
That seems wise. :-) Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
