Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of jue jun 17 10:47:41 -0400 2010:
> I sooooooo agree here ... and to make matters worse, when I go through all > of the groups once a week, I find a half dozen or more postings that > 'slipped through the cracks' that should have been approved, but weren't > ... but to get there, I have to weed through *hundreds* of postings to > find them ... > > But, I think you and I are exceptions here, in that we use the web > interface for moderation, and not just email ... although I'm not sure why > its so far to do a 'Reply' and type 'Reject' since ppl have to have > already checked the body of the message to now it shouldn't be approved > ... most of the work is already done by that point ... hey, count me as an exception as well. I do reject all spam that gets to me (-hackers and -committers these days only, plus -es-ayuda). I moderate *everything* I get by email -- but I never visit the website. If some stuff is still queued after I go through routine moderation, it's only because I didn't get it (remember there's a setting that says "only send to this many moderators", so no one should be swamped). I shared a recipe that allows Mutt to do one-keystroke moderation (saves a lot of work), and I recently wrote another one for Sup-mail which is what I'm currently using -- if anyone is interested in that one, let me know. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
