On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:03 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > David E. Wheeler wrote: > > On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > > >> I think this project is a great idea, and I think as a community we > >> ought to be behind it 100%. > >> > >> However, I do wonder what happened to the original name, which IIRC > >> was PGAN. That seems easier to pronounce, remember, ... > > > > I didn't care for it, personally. "Pee-Gan" sounds weird to my ear. I > > prefer "pee-gee-ex-en." But you can go for "pixin" or "pigskin" if you'd > > rather. ;-) > > > > My bike shed is chartreuse, > > heh I'm with Robert on that PGXN just sounds and speels weird - PGAN was > much easier ;)
I actually like PGXN. PGXN is marketable. Yeah that may not be what -hackers are after but if I stand up in front of a Fortune 500 company and say, "We have PGXN" it sounds a heck of a lot better that PGAN. Joshua D. Drake > > > Stefan > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
