On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > hmm ok - but assuming sync rep we would end up with something like the > following(hypotetically assuming each operation takes 1 time unit): > > originally: > > write 1 > sync 1 > network 1 > write 1 > sync 1 > > total: 5 > > whereas in the new case we would basically have the write+sync compete with > network+write+sync in parallel(total 3 units) and we would only have to wait > for the slower of those two sets of operations instead of the total time of > both or am I missing something.
Yeah, this is what I'd like to say. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
