Jan Wieck wrote: > > > Psql and libpq would simply issue the query according to the > > > user's request as they currently do. What's pain with it ? > > > > If they wanted to place a timeout on all queries in a session, they > > would need a SET for every query, which seems like a pain. > > Er, how many "applications" have you implemented by simply > providing a schema and psql?
Actually, I would assume nightly batch jobs are configured this way. > > I mean, users normally don't use psql. And if you do, what's > wrong with controlling the timeout yourself and hitting ^C > when "you" time out? If you do it in a script, it's Yes, clearly meaningless for interactive use. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
