On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jan Wieck <janwi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I'm puzzled how you would define this value. How do you add 7 inserts, >> 7 deletes, and 7 updates? Is that 21 rows modified? > > I actually have a hard time understanding why people are so opposed to a > feature that has zero impact at all unless a DBA actually turns in ON. What > is the problem with exposing the commit order of transactions?
The post you were responding to was regarding the meaninglessness of the "number of records" attribute you wanted. Your response is a non sequitor. I think the commit order of transactions would be a good thing to expose though I've asked repeatedly what kind of interface you need and never gotten answers to all the questions. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
