On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 17:56 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> > I don't understand why you want to use a different delay when you're >> > restoring from archive vs. when you're streaming (what about existing WAL >> > files found in pg_xlog, BTW?). The source of WAL shouldn't make a >> > difference. >> >> Yes. The pace of a recovery has nothing to do with that of log shipping. >> So to hurry up a recovery when restoring from archive seems to be useless. > > When streaming drops for some reason we revert to scanning the archive > for files. There is clearly two modes of operation.
Yes. > So it makes sense > that you might want to set different times for the parameter in each > case. What purpose would that serve? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
