2010/5/31 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> So as far as I can tell, no one is opposed to replacing "expr AS name" >>> with "name := expr" in the named-parameter syntax. Obviously we had >>> better get this done before beta2. Is anyone actually working on the >>> code/docs changes? If not, I'll pick it up. > >> If we eventually are going to want to support the ANSI standard "=>" >> syntax, I am thinking we should just do it now. The larger question is >> what justification do we have of not supporting "=>". > > Not breaking hstore, as well as any third-party modules that might be > using that operator name. Did you not absorb any of the discussion > so far? >
can we search thise applications? I know only about hstore module. We can ask people who use it in own applications. But every major version of PostgreSQL can breaks compatibility - like 9.0 with variable names in plpgsql. Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
