On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Assuming we want a release Postgres 9.0 by mid-August, here is how the > timetable would look: > > Need RC release to be stable for 1-2 weeks before final > RC must be released by August 1 > Beta must be stable for 2-3 weeks before RC > Stable beta must be released by early July > > So, we have 5-6 weeks to get a stable beta. Looking at the open issues: > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items#Resolved_Issues > > it looks like we are doing OK, but we must continue progressing.
This is a really short list. Several of these items have already been fixed, and others have been discussed extensively and are just a question of making a final decision. The thorniest question we have yet to resolve is what to do about max_standby_delay - I think we need Tom and Heikki to review this patch by Simon: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01666.php The real question in terms of release, I think, is how long we want to wait for more bugs to be found, and/or how much time do we want to allow for Tom and others to do further review of the code. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
