On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:55:54PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> > wrote: > > On May 27, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > >>> I think we should fix it now. Quick thought: maybe we could use FOR > >>> instead of AS: select myfunc(7 for a, 6 for b); > >> > >> I'm afraid FOR doesn't work either; it'll create a conflict with the > >> spec-defined SUBSTRING(x FOR y) syntax. > > > > How about "ISPARAMVALUEFOR"? That shouldn't conflict with anything. > > Or we could use the Finnish word > epäjärjestelmällistyttämättömyydellänsäkäänköhän, which I'm pretty > sure is not currently used in our grammar.
We could use the Turkish muvaffakiyetsizleştiricileştiriveremeyebileceklerimizdenmişsinizcesine, which I'm pretty sure isn't either :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
