On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:50 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > For now, I agree that we support a quorum commit feature for 9.1 or later. > But I don't think that it's simpler, more intuitive and easier-to-understand > than per-standby setting. So I think that we should include the per-standby > setting in the first patch.
There already is a first patch to the community that implements quorum commit, just not by you. If you have a better way, describe it in detail and in full now, with reference to each of the use cases you mentioned, so that people get a chance to give their opinions on your design. Then we can let the community decide whether or not that second way is actually better. We may not need a second patch. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
