2010/5/27 Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@toroid.org>: > At 2010-05-27 08:50:18 +0200, pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I don't see any advantage of "FOR". We can change ir to support new >> standard or don't change it. > > Adopting FOR would mean we don't use AS in a way that conflicts with the > standard. That's its only advantage. But I agree with you, I don't think > it's worth inventing a new non-standard wart for this case.
current using "AS" isn't in conflict with standard .. look to standard, please. Pavel > > I don't really like the idea of getting rid of => as an operator either; > I'm torn between staying true to the standard and politely looking the > other way as Tom suggested we might end up doing. > > -- ams > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
