Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Anyway, I have no idea where the idea that recommending time > > synchronization is a somehow a "high end" requirement, > > Considering that clock skew was only one of several scenarios in which > the max_standby_delay code misbehaves, it's not that important whether > you consider it highly probable or not. The code still needs a > redesign, and we may as well eliminate the assumption of tight > synchronization while we are at it. There's no really good reason to > have that requirement in there.
Should I be concerned that we are redesigning HS features at this stage in the release? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
