On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> One possible thing we might do (bearing in mind that we might need to >> wall off access at multiple levels) would be to forbid creating a >> relcache entry for a non-local temprel. That would, in turn, forbid >> doing pretty much anything to such a relation, although I'm not sure >> what else would get broken in the process. > > Dropping temprels left behind by a crashed backend would get broken by > that; which is a deal-breaker, because we have to be able to clean those > up.
Phooey. It was such a good idea in my head. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
