On Tue, May 4, 2010 18:19, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 18:10 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> It would be interesting if anyone repeated these simple tests and >> produced evidence that these non-HS. >> >> (Unfortunately, I have at the moment not much time for more testing) > > Would you be able to make those systems available for further testing?
No. sorry. > First, I'd perform the same test with the systems swapped, so we know > more about the symmetry of the issue. After that, would like to look > more into internals. you mean "systems swapped", primary and standby? primary and standby were on the same machine in these tests (even the same raid). I can eventually move the standby (the 'slow' side, as it stands) to another, quite similar machine. Not in the coming days though... > Is it possible to setup SytemTap and dtrace on these systems? I did install systemtap last week. dtrace is not installed (I think. I've never used either.) Erik Rijkers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
