Hi, I'm Korean. CP51949 is EUC-KR correct. so, that defined code is correct too.
But in Korea, EUC-KR code is not good to use all Korean character. In recent years, many people in Korea use the CP949 code. MS Windows codepage also is CP949. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:27 PM Subject: [HACKERS] CP949 for EUC-KR? >I heard pg_get_encoding_from_locale() failed in kor locale. > > WARNING: could not determine encoding for locale "kor": codeset is "CP949" > > I found the following description in the web: > CP949 is EUC-KR, extended with UHC (Unified Hangul Code). > > http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/libiconv/libiconv-13.2/libiconv/lib/cp949.h > > but we define CP51949 for EUC-KR in chklocale.c. > {PG_EUC_KR, "CP51949"}, /* or 20949 ? */ > > Which is the compatible codeset with our PG_EUC_KR encoding? > 949, 51949, or 20949? Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR? > > Regards, > --- > Takahiro Itagaki > NTT Open Source Software Center > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
