Bruce Momjian wrote: > Well, that is going to make the documentation more complicated than it > already is. Why mention a process in 9.0 that no one needs to use? I > am not writing the docs for some hypothetical release, but for 9.0. > When we have some restriction, we can document that. > > My guess is that 9.2 will be able to upgrade from 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, and > 9.1, but that going to 9.5 will require you to go to 9.2 first, run some > script, then upgrade to 9.5; again all hypothetical. I think we can > require people using pg_migrator to read matching documentation for that > major version of pg_migrator, and pg_migrator will enforce any > restrictions we come up with in the future. For example, I assume there > will be some major version of Postgres where pg_migrator will not work > at all.
I do think we are going to have to mention new pg_migrator restrictions in the major release notes for future versions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
